🔗 Share this article US Men's Major Title Drought Is Not Taylor Fritz's Responsibility to Bear I possess a few thoughts about the remarks delivered by the sports network commentator a well-known announcer after Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the US Open last eight. Consider – Fritz is American, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to patriotic sentiment. A little bit of letdown was understandable. Instead, Fowler invoked the ongoing drought of American men at the majors: not one of them had lifted a title since the last American champion in 2003, and he had been the last one standing in the competition. Everyone love a narrative, myself included. But really. Even if the American had beaten the legend for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was looming in the following match, who Fritz has yet to beat in an official match. And if he’d someway gotten past that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, against whom the American had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also split the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to thrash a fatigued Djokovic in the subsequent match). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he in fact preferred his draw, because it offered the chance to defeat the three best players in the world back-to-back. Fritz is well within his right to aspire to the accomplishment; an athlete is supposed to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions on the brain? The American star's second serve the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories The American, 28, is placed fourth in the world entering the upcoming year-end championships and has won his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with increasing ease. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: The Italian and Spaniard lie a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive strength on each forehand and reverse side are more than enough to dispose of the majority of opponents on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of once-in-a-lifetime players, however, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The last several years has seen the interesting emergence of tall, gangly players who can nonetheless move around with the surprising quickness and grace of smaller men. He is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His movement is stiff, as if he’s still getting used to his limbs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and playing a soft shot versus him is typically a reliable tactic. That acts as a pretty harsh restriction on his potential. Fritz has made a several significant, improbable improvements over the years. Early on of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months after, he was approaching the top 10. Last year, he suddenly surged up to No 4 – and maintained the spot. But the subsequent step, mixing it up with and beating all-time-greats like the young Spaniard, the Italian, and including a aging Serbian, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to defeat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the ongoing drought of American men lifting grand slams when he had exited the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just excessive and the respect for the magnitude of the task too little. The American star achieved a career-best run to the Wimbledon last four in the summer. The American's performance in that very last eight match should have been enough of an indication. Djokovic triumphed in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when the American had saved a few match points and had a chance to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion rescued service break opportunity after service break opportunity, extending the streak to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did claim a single of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible service game to lose his own serve once more; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the main contest and compelled him to expend excessive energy to prevail. Down match points in the final game, his primary delivery floated to heaven. He prolonged the match two times on his second serve, but finally double-faulted. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, just a consequence of needing to hit an excessive number of second serves. The match was quite ironclad proof that the American is not good enough to beat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and did not especially appeared like he thought he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is the individuals who were anticipating Fritz to prevail, and putting pressure on him to achieve that, when he was had not done anything that indicated he would. Fritz is an valuable contributor to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding almost everyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, prepared to not only express how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but clarify it. That he ought to shoulder the majority of the responsibility for the United States not spawn a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is competing alongside him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that burden.) ATP Finals: Player Divisions American legend Division Carlos Alcaraz (Sp) Taylor Fritz (US) Alex de Minaur (Aus) Lorenzo Musetti (It) Swedish icon Division Jannik Sinner (It) Alexander Zverev (Ger) The rising American Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can) “I would likely think about it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American told an interviewer in June of claiming a major. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that breaking through Alcaraz and Sinner’s young, terrifying empire is in fact extremely unlikely for all other players. {